Massive The popular press would have us believe that
massive refers to the enormous numbers of registrants that have been associated
with well-publicized MOOCs, such as Sebastian Thrun’s, 2011 course on
Artificial Intelligence with 160,000 registrants. However, the original intent
behind the use of the word massive focused on the massive potential or
capacity to “enable and engage conversations and activities across multiple
platforms” – Stephen Downes, What Makes a MOOC Massive?
This delights me and I
think it suits open and connected learning to a T – but then I am not surprised
because Stephen Downes, Dave Cormier, George Siemens and Alex Couros (the
originators of the term and first practitioners of MOOCs) are all proponents of open and connected
learning.
Open refers to access, i.e. free and available to
anyone. "The word open is in constant negotiation." (Cormeir & Siemens, July/August, 2010 Educause Review). I think the quintessential element of “open” is about opening oneself
to be free and available to explore new ideas, concepts, patterns, connections,
and self-reflections. Opening involves mindfulness, calm, patience and
practice. The critical element of practice is that it happens over the
course of time, there is no point in, practicing fast. My ideal is
that the connections made in the OPEN ‘gathering’ and my own opening will
function like a coach and work with me in a formative manner to draw out my
best thinking and knowing. Experience tells me that this type of opening to
Self comes through “listening hard”.
In keeping with the
importance of connecting and crediting I have to mention that the initial
shift to looking at the possibility of the first O in MOOC standing for opening
rather than open came from Gardner
Campbell. I was having a tough time finding Gardner’s
post to link with, so I used Twitter to direct message @bali_maha,
who is part of my PLN and she responded, within the hour, with the requested link
– which illustrates a PLN at work! Listening to Hybrid Pod's, Listening to Students, also served as an inspiration for this post.
Online should not signify the same old thing just in a different
form (wolf in sheep's clothing seems like an apt analogy here!). It needs to be a whole new form of communication. The Internet has
enabled us to think in a new “meta language”. Online should not simply be a way
of taking text books or lectures and broadcasting them online! I have
posted on the new "meta language" of the Internet several times.
In, Networks are Expanding Our Ignorance, I
summarize Robert K. Logan's basic thesis regarding human meta languages
developing as a result of information overload. In, Has the Internet Changed how We Think? Yet?, I
refer to how the "ability to connect on a large scale and to genuinely
collaborate and create rather than simply co-ordinate is what distinguishes
Internet communication from previous communication forms."
Course The trouble with using the term course
is that most people who have gone to school associate course with a
teacher/student dichotomy that views the teacher as the sage on the stage or
the person with information that needs to be poured into students. Students are
taught to be passive and wait for, rather than seek, information.
" . . . the concept of
a “course” has been significantly
challenged. In particular, questions
have arisen as to the key value of the course in the educational system. Is the value the content—
the academic journal articles, lectures, textbooks, and libraries that compose much of the teaching and learning process?
Or is it the engagement and interaction that occurs through
discussions? Or is it the self-organized activities of learners
in the social spaces of a college or university? " (Cormier & Siemens, 2009)
Suffice it to say this
is not the approach taken in an open and connected cMOOC, although it does tend
to accurately characterize many xMOOCs. For me the C in MOOC is all about
agency - about taking responsibility for charting my own learning course,
tailoring it to my needs and sharing my riches with other navigators.
So for me:
M signifies the prism of possibilities and
the Massive potential for divergent thinking.
the 1st O refers
to Opening to myself, to learning,to sharing, and to receiving.
the 2nd O is
about dealing successfully with Overload. It is about connecting
and new forms of communication and learning.
C is about navigating wisely and charting my
own Course.
http://applieddisruption.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341f604153ef0168e8086ead970c-pi