My latest musings regarding PLNs and ownership issues are
related to the whole dichotomy between outcomes and competencies. I think non-ownership, outcomes & competencies are all interwoven.
I have been thinking about Kimberly Scott asking me (in the
comments to my, October 12, 2013 The Curious
Relationship between Ownership & Networks) “Do you think that
your employer can rightly demand that you provide a list of the people who are
in your personal/professional learning network?” When I pause to wonder why an
employer would demand a list of people in a PLN I come up with the thought
that the employer may want to protect their investment (of employee time
and effort) in the PLN. The employer might feel that they “own” the outcomes. In fact
they may even have stipulated outcome expectations in regards to a PLN developed while “on the clock”.
This thinking is antithetical to PLNs. I do believe that PLNs can assist people in achieving outcomes - this can and does happen BUT for me it falls into the camp of using a new
technology as if it were the old technology and not capitalizing on the
characteristics that make it new and different i.e. missing the point of the paradigm shift.
The strength
of a PLN is that nonlinear interactions and engagement results in emergent competence
that is distributed across the network. This sort of emergent thinking
is, as David Weinberger says, “inextricable from—literally unthinkable without—the
network that enables it”. (Weinberger, 2011) Or as William Cronon (1998)
states, “More than anything else, being an educated person means being able to
see connections so as to be able to make sense of the world and act within it
in creative ways”.
Siemen’s, Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing Roles for Educators and
Designers (2008) articulates much the same view. So, I reason, outcomes are possible from PLNs but they do not
represent optimal use of networks. I
think that networks optimally support competency acquisition!
To recap my thinking;
- · PLNs cannot be owned
- · Using PLNs to achieve outcomes is not maximizing the potential of PLNs
- · PLNs greatest strength is to support the acquisition of competencies
- · Employers benefit from increased employee competence
- · Competence is not something organizations own nor can competence be delivered in a binder to the next person being asked to do the job
Cronon,
William. (1998) 10 Qualities of a Liberally Educated Person. Retrieved from http://www.honors.ls.wisc.edu/SiteContent.aspx?prev=1&id=159
Siemens,
George. (January 27, 2008). Learning
and knowing in networks: changing roles for educators and designers. presented
to ITFORUM for Discussion Retrieved from http://itforum.coe.uga.edu/Paper105/Siemens.pdf
Weinberger,
David. (2011) Too Big to Know: rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren't
the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room Is the room.
New York: Basic Books.
Hi Maureen, I meant to comment on this a few days ago..I really like these ideas, and they have influenced my thinking about how organisational PLNs might work. I've been thinking about an organisationally driven PLN 'implementation' in the context of the #xplrpln 'problem' and pondering whether or not such a thing would even work - or even whether the idea of a CEO / org driven 'implementation' is actually at odds with the whole concept of a PLN, which is individually driven, and based on personally defined intentions.
ReplyDeleteMy concern - stemming from your previous discussion of ownership - is that a CEO / org driven PLN 'implementation' introduces perceptions of org ownership of the 'implementation' (> and the PLNs), and may lead to the expectation that individuals align their PLNs with org objectives, which seems at odds with the concept of a PLN - and may in fact kill the most valuable part of a PLN - the Personal bit.
I think the concept of using PLNs to develop individual competencies is very intriguing - and will likely work, as long as those individual competencies are those that the individual also values and feels personally motivated to develop.